Connect with us


ARMSGATE: EFCC seeks court’s order to separate Dasuki’s trial from co-defendants’



Dasuki’s family drags Malami to NBA

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) told an FCT High Court on Thursday that it would ask to separate the trial of former National Security Adviser (NSA), Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd) from that of seven other defendants.

The EFCC arraigned Dasuki in 2015 on two separate cases alongside other defendants before Justice Hussein Baba-Yusuf.

The ex-NSA is standing trial on alleged misappropriation of arms procurement funds.

In the first case Dasuki was charged alongside a former Minister of State for Finance, Bashir Yuguda; a former Governor of Sokoto State, Attahiru Bafarawa, his son, Sagir and his company, Dalhatu Investment Limited.

They were docked on a 25-count charge of criminal breach of trust and misappropriation of public fund to the tune N19.4 billion.

In the second case, Dasuki is arraigned alongside a former General Manager of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Baba- Kusa and two firms: Acacia Holdings Limited and Reliance Referral Hospital Limited.

They were charged with a 19-count charge of money laundering and breach of trust to the tune of N13.5 billion alongside a former Director of Finance and Administration, Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), Shuaibu Salisu, who was later removed from the charge.

Read also: EDO APC CRISIS: 3 things Obaseki wants Oshiomhole to remember

At the resumed sitting in the case FCT/HC/CR/43/2015, EFCC counsel, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), expressed frustration over the continuous absence of Dasuki, who is the first defendant in the case.

He told the court that the prosecution had filed a motion dated November 4, seeking the continuation of trial in Dasuki’s absence, adding that the prosecution was served with a counter affidavit on Thursday morning.

Jacobs, however, said the best thing to do in the present circumstance was the unbundling of the case so that Dasuki would be separated from other defendants.

He lamented the frustration with the continuation of the case, and said “we can’t be in the same place for four years without moving.”

He, therefore, told the court that the charge against the defendants might be amended to remove Dasuki’s name to enable other defendants face their trial without further delays.

Join the conversation


Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

13 − 8 =