Last week, President Muhammadu Buhari fought back critics who hold the opinion that his appointments and developmental projects are tainted by nepotism and ethnic considerations.
His response stems from the plethora of criticisms that have trailed his supposed flouting of the Federal Character Principle as enshrined in the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
This, and two other stories, shaped major conversations around the Buhari presidency past week.
Fighting back critics
On June 21, President Buhari declared that his administration had not discriminated against any region of the country in terms of projects, infrastructural development and federal appointments.
Speaking in Abuja at the Progressive Youth Conference, Buhari said, “So far, all the policies initiatives, projects and even appointments by this administration has been guided by equity and inclusiveness. There is actually no part of the country that has not been impacted positively in the areas of infrastructure, agriculture and economic support initiatives, based on peculiarities of the regions.”
He was represented by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Boss Mustapha.
Buhari’s claim of inclusiveness is one that has generated the most of debates since the emergence of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
Individuals, including groups, have called out the President on their dissatisfaction with his projects, and appointments which tend to favour mostly those from the Northern belt of the country.
Critics have constantly argued that Buhari is yet to wean himself of a statement attributed to him on July 22, 2015 when he said, “Going by election results, constituencies that gave me 95 per cent cannot in all honesty be treated, on some issues, with constituencies that gave me five per cent.
While Buhari has the right to distance himself from accusations of not properly managing the country’s diversity, he needs not to be reminded that there are glaring examples of how his leadership has failed to harness this latent resource.
The negative perceptions have become too weighty to ignore and the administration may do well to look inwards, and see where amends can be made to give the federating units a greater sense of belonging in the Nigerian project.
Two other talking points
READ ALSO: ASO ROCK WATCH: Lonely at the top!
Dealing with drug trafficking
On June 26, President Buhari identified drug trafficking and abuse as more dangerous to the stability of the country than banditry and insurgency.
Speaking at the launch of the War Against Drug Abuse (WADA), which is an initiative of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), Buhari, represented by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Boss Mustapha, said:
“So, it is more deadly than even the security challenges that we are having in this country, and I believe strongly that every effort must be put in place to ensure that we deal with the issues of substance abuse, and trafficking, and manufacture.”
NDLEA claims that about 10.6 million Nigerians abuse drugs, and that ordinarily should be a major source of concern to discerning Nigerians.
Buhari, perhaps, had borrowed a leave from Senate President Ahmad Lawan who, on March 3, raised the alarm that drug barons were responsible for funding of terrorists.
The President’s claim, though arguable, given the wholesome destruction and dislocation of societies through violence, should serve as a challenge for a moral regeneration of the country.
In this regard, therefore, the need for a concerted response cannot be underestimated. The NDLEA, and other relevant government institutions and/or agencies must work to arrest the growing scourge, and salvage the country from those who are determined to destroy it.
The disturbing developments should see more action and less talk.
Osinbajo said this when he received in audience the Oluyin of Iyin Ekiti, His Royal Majesty, Oba Adeola Adeniyi Ajakaiye, at the Aso Rock Villa, Abuja.
He said: “I can assure you that soon, the issue of insecurity will be a thing of the past and that we will live in peace and prosperity in this country.”
Yes, Nigerians do need assurances that all will be well amidst the pitiable security challenges orchestrated by Boko Haram terrorists, bandits and the so-called unknown gunmen.
While Osinbajo brings his persuasive skills to the table, it would be trite to state that troubled Nigerians need more than mere assurances.
They want to see what the government is doing, how it is doing it, and the result of the actions taken, all to stem the raging tide making life hellish for them.
By John Chukwu
Join the conversation
INVESTIGATION… Ten years after, communities count losses as AfDB, Cross River govt abandon road project
Ten years after the Cross River State government and African Development Bank (AFDB) jointly awarded the Yahe-Wanokom-Wanikade-Benue border road for...
INVESTIGATION….N.3bn down the drain: Why water projects for Enugu communities don’t work
In this concluding part, ARINZE CHIJIOKE talks about some of the projects that are serving the people and how various WASH programmes have failed to tackle...
INVESTIGATION…PARKVIEW ESTATE: Exclusive images of how billionaire property developer incurred Lagos govt‘s anger
Many have seen the demolished building, but not many know the circumstances that led to the teardown of the about...
INVESTIGATION… N.3bn down the drain, as Enugu communities suffer from dry taps
In November 2020, three organizations and the Enugu State government celebrated the completion of N300 million worth of projects that were expected...
INVESTIGATION… How herdsmen crisis compounds woes of already deprived Ogun communities
Earlier in January, the Nigerian media space was awash with reports of violence between herders and farmers across the country....