Connect with us

News

Court admits witness statement in Atiku’s son-in-law’s trial

Published

on

EFCC fails in bid to stop Atiku’s son-in-law from medical trip abroad, but...

A Federal High Court Lagos, on Wednesday, admitted the extrajudicial statement of Bashir Garba, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) witness, in the ongoing trial of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s son-in-law, Abdulahi Babalele.

An extrajudicial statement is an out-of-court utterance which can be either written or oral.

The EFCC had accused Babalele of allegedly laundering about $140,000 in the build-up to the last general elections.

The defendant was first arraigned on August 14, during the court’s long vacation before Justice Nicholas Oweibo, who sat as a vacation judge.

He had pleaded not guilty to the charge and was granted bail in the sum of N20 million with one surety in like sum.

After the court’s resumption, however, the case file was re-assigned to a new judge, Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke and the defendant was re-arraigned on October 8

He had also pleaded not guilty to the charges and was allowed to continue on the earlier bail.

At the last adjourned date, the prosecution opened its case and called its first witness, Garba, a clearing agent, and friend to the defendant.

In his chief examination directed by the prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, the witness had testified how he delivered the naira equivalent of the $140,000 to former President Olusegun Obasanjo, following the defendant’s instructions.

But, under cross-examination by the defence counsel, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), the defendant affirmed that he wrote statements at the EFCC’s office during investigation.

When Ozekhome sought to tender one of his statements as an exhibit, the prosecution raised objection on the tendering and admissibility of an extrajudicial statement of a witness, citing the case of Okeke Vs State.

The court had then adjourned for a ruling.

In his ruling on Wednesday, Justice Aneke, agreed with the submission of the prosecution on the admissibility of such document, with an addendum, that same could only be admissible, where the proper foundation is laid.
The court then held that the defence was at liberty to lay the required foundation if it so desired.

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now