Connect with us

Politics

First Bank director challenges seizure of Diezani’s $153m, demands $40m

Published

on

First Bank director challenges seizure of Diezani’s $153m, demands $40m

Intrigues are developing around the $153 million found in several bank accounts alleged to belong to former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke.

The temporary forfeiture order placed on the funds has been challenged by the Executive Director, Public Sector Accountant, of First Bank Plc, Mr. Dauda Lawal.

Lawal also in a counter-affidavit filed through his lawyer, Mr. Charles Adeogun, before the Federal High Court in Lagos on Tuesday, demanded to have possession of $40million of the $153 million.

Lawal, who said although he received $25million out of the money for certain services he rendered, also claimed that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) arrested him and made him sign under duress to return $65million.

According to him, the agency subsequently took possession of the $40m in draft and registered it as exhibit EFCC 03.

The EFCC had claimed that Diezani siphoned $153million out of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation and stashed it in three banks in the country.

But, Diezani in a statement from her London base has denied any such thing maintaining that the anti-graft agency was lying against her, and simply prosecuting her in the public and media space without evidence.

The anti-graft agency had on January 6 approached Justice Muslim Hassan and got an interim order instructing that the funds be temporarily forfeited to the Federal Government.

Justice Hassan had adjourned till January 24 after giving the order, and asked Lawal, and any other party interested in the money to appear before him to prove the legitimacy of the money.

He had then said that failure for anybody to prove the legitimacy of the $153million would mean permanently forfeiting it to the Federal Government.

As soon as the case was called up on Tuesday, the EFCC lawyer, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, told the judge that in obedience with the court order that copies of the forfeiture order had been served on the respondents and also published in the Daily Independent Newspaper on January 12.

Adeogun, counsel to Lawal who acknowledged that he has been served, told the presiding judge that he had already filed a counter-affidavit, deposed to by Lawal himself, challenging same.

He told the court that while it was true his client admitted receiving only $25million for discharging particular duties, the EFCC coerced him to admit receiving a total of $65million, he therefore asked the court to mandate the commission to release the excess $40million to his client.

Read also: Court orders freeze on more bank accounts linked to Patience Jonathan

He argued that the undertaking signed by his client in the EFCC custody was involuntary.

“We became aware of the forfeiture order when the interim order was served on us. My client was never confronted with these sets of facts during his incarceration at the EFCC. After service of the orders, I requested the statement of my client to the commission, but same was never given to me,” Adeogun said.

In his response, Oyedepo, counsel to the EFCC maintained that Diezani laundered the said $153million in conspiracy with Lawal and others.

“My Lord, paragraph 4 of our reply affidavit shows a meeting of the minds of one Gbenga Komolafe, former Group MD, Crude Oil Marketing Division, NNPC; Prince Haruna Momoh, a former Group MD, Petroleum Product Marketing Company; Umar Farouk Ahmed, Group MD, Nigerian Product Marketing Company; as well as Dauda Lawal, to launder the funds on behalf of the former Petroleum Minister, Diezani Alison-Madueke.

“It will amount to contesting the obvious for Lawal to argue that he had no knowledge of the said sums,” Oyedepo said.

Justice Hassan fixed February 16, 2017 for judgment.

 

 

Ripples Nigeria…without borders, without fear

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now

Click to comment

0 Comments

  1. yanju omotodun

    January 25, 2017 at 3:25 pm

    It is crystal clear that Diezeni and Lawal laundered this money so no need to delay justice till february 16th, this is how they keep adjourning clear cases till infinity.

    • yanju omotodun

      January 25, 2017 at 4:03 pm

      He

    • JOHNSON PETER

      January 25, 2017 at 4:06 pm

      Without concrete evidences and facts, judgements can not be made. Everyone has right to fair hearing. Lawal said efcc made him signed documents under duress which calls for special investigation.
      Facts must be proof beyond reasonable doubts in court.

      • chichi emerue

        January 26, 2017 at 5:44 am

        True talk

  2. Balarabe musa

    January 25, 2017 at 4:59 pm

    More banks directors will be arrested soon by efcc. They have bastardise the banking profession by joing hands with politicians to steal money just because of money. Lawal must be sentenced to life imprisonment to serve as deterrent to other bank directors.

    • Animashaun Ayodeji

      January 25, 2017 at 5:25 pm

      Honestly, there are so many illegal activities going on with banks and politicians.ost of these banks have multiple ‘ghost accounts’ funded by politicians while they get paid to manage them. Where this country is going is still not clear as regards corrupt.

    • Joy Madu

      January 26, 2017 at 5:42 am

      I agree with you he deserve to be sentence to life imprisonment because his a thief that join hand together with the politicals

  3. Johnson Amadi

    January 25, 2017 at 5:19 pm

    With the way this case is going, it will never end. I’m still surprised after so much noise, EFCC don’t have concrete facts to back their allegations up. EFCC has really not done much to bring Diezeni who they claimed have embezzled public funds closer to justice.

  4. Margret Dickson

    January 25, 2017 at 5:22 pm

    More people are definitely involved in this case. Diezeni will also employ the services of more people to proof EFCC wrong. Such amount of money cannot go down in one person’s purse without the knowledge of the key people in the banks.

  5. Roland Uchendu Pele

    January 25, 2017 at 7:35 pm

    “The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) arrested him and made him sign under duress to return $65million.”

    What’s up with the duress thingy? EFCC be torturing people anyhow.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

twelve + nineteen =