Connect with us


HDP returns to Supreme Court to challenge Buhari’s election




Hope Democratic Party (HDP) has returned to the Supreme Court to challenge the declaration of President Muhammadu Buhari as the winner of 2019 presidential election.

The apex court had recently sacked an earlier suit by the party challenging the emergence of Buhari on technical ground.

However, in a fresh motion filed before the Supreme Court, HDP is asking the apex court to reverse itself in the judgment delivered on October 3.

The party is contending that the judgment delivered by Justice Mary Peter Odili in favour of Buhari is invalid and unconstitutional.

The party said, the judgment was based on technicalities of law rather than merit and justice.

In the fresh motion on notice brought pursuant to order 8 rule 2 of the Supreme Court Rules and sections 6 and 36 of the 1999 constitution as well as section 22 of the Supreme Court Act, HDP and its presidential candidate, Chief Ambrose Albert Owuru, pleaded with the court to restore their appeal for fresh hearing on merit.

The motion filed by Chukwunonyerem Njoku, the appellants insisted that the dismissal of their appeal on October 3 on technical ground was without compliance with the mandatory procedure of law.

The fresh motion predicated on eight grounds indicated that the appeal dismissed on preliminary objection of Buhari without requisite applications after filed briefs and incorporation of notice of objection without leave of the apex court is a nullity and liable to be set aside.

The party further said that by virtue of order 8 upon which the dismissal was based, an appellant whose appeal has been dismissed under the rule may apply by notice of motion that the appeal be restored and heard on merit.

READ ALSO: ASO ROCK: Nigerians can now see why Buhari govt’s bedeviled by confusion, no progress —PDP

The appellants maintained that there are exceptional circumstances as required by law to cause the restoration of the appeal having been dismissed on technical ground without respondents first applying for or granted leave to prevent ambush or surprise to them to prevent the hearing of the appeal on merit and affirm their claim as winners of February 16, presidential referendum election.

Among other things, the party is also claiming that the decision of the court arising from respondents’ ambush, intimidation, misdirection of court and non compliance with the strict rules and procedures for hearing notice of preliminary objection is invalid and a nullity in law and liable to be set aside.

Join the conversation


Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now