Connect with us


Oops! Group insists GEJ no good for 2015



In what looks like an apparent mistake, or just plain blunder, the plaintiffs who withdrew their suit challenging the eligibility of President Goodluck Jonathan to seek re-election from a Federal High Court, Abuja, have re-filed the suit before a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Maitama, Abuja.
Justice Ishaq Bello on Wednesday fixed February 22 for the hearing of the suit.
Justice Ahmed Mohammed of the Federal High Court in Abuja had struck out the case when on February 11 the counsel for the plaintiffs applied to discontinue it.
The plaintiffs did not give any reason for discontinuing the case.
But the judge had ordered them to pay N50,000 to President Jonathan whose lawyers had been made to file responses before the decision to withdraw the suit.
The plaintiffs are Prof. Tunde Samuel, Dr. Junaidu Mohammed, Mr. Rasak Adeogun and Yahaya Ezeemoo Ndu.
President Jonathan is the only defendant in the suit. The president had been served through the publication of the court processes in the February 12, 2015 edition of a national newspaper in line with an earlier order of the court.
Counsel for the plaintiffs, Mallam Yusuf Ali (SAN) and that of the defendant, Mr. Kenechukwu Nomeh, were in court on Wednesday when the court fixed February 22 for the hearing in the suit.
In their originating summons filed through their counsel, Yusuf Ali (SAN), the plaintiffs contended that Jonathan was ineligible to re-contest for the office of the president, as allowing him to do so could amount to him spending more than eight years allowed for anyone to serve in the office.
They want the court to declare that by virtue of the provisions of the Constitution it was “unconstitutional, unlawful, illegal and not permissible for any person to occupy the office of the president of Nigeria for more than a cumulative and aggregate period of eight years when the country was not at war‎.”
They contended that if Jonathan won another term of four years from 2015, he would have been permitted to occupy the office of president for more than eight years.
They asked the court to declare that in computing the period already spent in office as president by Jonathan, the period from 6th day of May, 2010 to 28th May 2011 should be reckoned with.
They also sought a‎ declaration that having spent a period of more than four years in office as president since May 6, 2010, Jonathan no longer had the “competence, authority or entitlement to contest the same office for another term of four years.”
‎There are about two other suits challenging Jonathan’s eligibility to seek another term in office, still pending before Justice Mohammed at the Federal High Court. There are two others before the Court of Appeal in Abuja.


Join the conversation


Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now