Connect with us

News

OYO: APC’s Adelabu suffers another defeat as tribunal upholds Makinde’s election

Published

on

We’ll investigate gov Makinde’s wealth once we receive directives —CCB

Oyo State chapter of the All Progressives Congress, with its governorship candidate in the last election, Adebayo Adelabu, suffered another defeat on Monday as the Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Ibadan upheld the victory of Gov. Seyi Makinde of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

Adebayo Adelabu had filed a petition against Makinde on the outcome of the March 9 governorship election in the state.

Adelabu and the APC challenged the declaration of Makinde by INEC as the winner of the March 9 governorship election in Oyo State.

Makinde polled 515,621 votes to defeat his closest rival, Adelabu who had 357,982 votes. PDP and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) were respondents in the suit.

According to the petitioners, Makinde was not duly elected by majority of lawful votes.

They claimed that the election was marred by over voting and failure to comply with the provisions of the Electoral Act.

Adelabu, therefore, prayed the tribunal to declare him the winner of the election, adding that he scored the highest number of lawful votes or alternatively, the tribunal should nullify the election and order a re-run.

The chairman of the three-man tribunal, Justice Muhammed Sirajo, who delivered the unanimous judgment, said the testimonies of the ward and local government agents called by the petitioners could not be relied upon.

Sirajo said that 32 pieces of evidence, out of the 69 witnesses called by the petitioners, were hearsay because the petitioners were ward and local government collation agents while the remaining 37 were polling unit agents.

He also maintained that the petitioners called 69 witnesses and tendered 4,164 exhibits while the respondents called 15 witnesses, adding that the testimony of an eye witness must come from the polling units’ agents who witnessed all that happened from the beginning to the end during the election.

The tribunal said that the petitioners also failed to tender necessary documents that would have assisted members of the tribunal in proving ballot paper accounting.

He said that it was not only the responsibilities of petitioners to tender documents but also to prove that the alleged irregularities in the election substantially affected the outcome of the election.

READ ALSO: Gov Makinde gives condition under which he’ll waive his immunity to be probed

Sirajo said that the petitioners failed to prove that the respondents were not validly elected by majority of lawful votes.

“The petitioner failed to prove the allegation of non-compliance, non-accreditation, over voting and corrupt practices that would warrant the tribunal to nullified the election,“ he said.

Sirajo, who said that the petition lacked merit and stood dismissed, awarded N200,000 cost against the petitioners.

In an interview, the counsel to the petitioners, Mr Akin Oladeji, said they would decide on the next line of action after studying the judgment

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

two × 1 =