Connect with us

Politics

PROBE: IGP, Senators in hot exchange, as police boss refuses to answer questions

Published

on

Embattled Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Ibrahim Idris, on Wednesday, informed the Senate adhoc committee constituted to probe various allegations leveled against him, that he will not respond to any questions from lawmakers.

The police boss who appeared with his lawyer, Alex Izinyon, at about 2.30pm, told the committee headed by Senator Francis Alimikhena that since the case is already in court, it will be subjudice for him to respond to any queries from lawmakers.

He also claimed that the existence of the committee was against the Standing Rules of the Senate. He challenged the legality of the committee to probe him, since the case is already before a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court.

IGP stated briefly: “I will not make any oral comment or answer any question in respect of the allegations in view of the various civil and criminal cases pending in the law courts, more especially when the senator has already been arraigned in court in respect of this matter.

“I decided to appear before this Senate committee on the allegations out of high respect I have for the Senate and my respect for the rule of law.

Read Also : MAINA: Senate to conduct Malami, Dambazau, others’ probe in camera

“Furthermore, it is expected that the Senate and the committee will refrain from making references to the issues as it will be against Order 41 (7) and 53 (5) of the Senate Standing Orders 2 (15) as amended.”

Mr. Izinyon had a heated argument with the senators, when he earlier stopped the police boss from responding to questions raised by the committee chairman, Alimikhena.

“I represent the IGP. I want to state that we have very high respect for the Senate. In pursuant of the invitation, we decided to be here to demonstrate that we have nothing to hide. I have gotten instructions from the IGP. We have responded to all the allegations raised word to word to the committee.

“This is an adhoc committee. There are rules. I am urging you to use your rules. In October 2015, a similar arose between an adhoc committee and Rotimi Amaechi. Ethics committee was asked to investigate him. Because the case was before a court in Rivers State, the Senate suspended it.

“The Standing Rules of the Senate says that when a case is in court, any reference to it maybe prejudice. Nigerians are interested in this. We are saying this in the interest of justice. We are not hiding anything at all. I am only drawing your attention to precedents set by the Senate.

“Senator Melaye raised that case. The matter is already subjudice. I will plead with you to look at the item and see if everything was captured in the response. Today, an FCT panel has granted an order that this panel should come before,” Izinyon told the committee.

His response did not go down well with Alimikhena, who responded angrily. He told Idris and his lawyer, Izinyon that the committee had already been set up before they went to court.

Alimikhena responded angrily: “You cannot tell us the FCT High Court has given an order. You cannot tell us what we do not know. This is a committee set up by the committee. It was set up before you went to court. The court is interfering with our work. Let us stick with the truth. The Senate is not out to witch hunt anybody. If you are going to go to court, it does not stop the Senate from probing the virement made by the Police boss. You cannot stop that.

Izinyon retorted: “The law is clear. If there is any virement, the Senate will not look at it. It is a criminal offence and it is not the Senate that should handle that.”

Senator Hope Uzodinma who is also a member of the committee intervened. He pleaded with Alimikhena to adjourn the hearing to allow the committee study the contents of the written response of the IGP.

Uzodinma intervened: “I want to caution you. We are all statesmen in the country. We are all one. If we must succeed as a country, we must create a synergy where both arms must work together. The SAN, you must agree with me that this is not a law court. You will do a favour to resolve any differences between these parties.

“The Standing Rules says “if its the opinion of the Senate President”. Are you the Senate President? This matter needs to be resolved in a manner that Nigerians will be happy. If we issue a warrant, the IGP will bring himself. I do not even know why the IGP cannot speak for himself.

“We want to see the allegations before us and see how we can resolve them in the interest of the country. If the IGP is not in a position to speak in my view, he can submit. We can look into it and decide on how to move forward. No too much quotations. This is a parliament.

Senator Obinna Ogba, also appealed that the hearing be suspended, said, “Having heard what the IGP said, I have seen some documents we need to study. I want to appeal to the chairman to give us time to study the documents and invite the IGP later,” he said.

Joshua Lidani, Suleiman Hukunyi, Abdulaziz Nyako and Nelson Effiong who spoke, also called for an adjournment.

Lidani said: “I think it makes sense for us to study the documents.. From the reaction from the chairman, it appears that the preliminary objections will not be entertained. We have just been served this documents. We will study it. We will determine if you have been able to address the issues raised.

“Senator Misau raised the issue because he said his privileges were abused. It was not a public petition. We need time to look at the documents you submitted. If the issues are not adequately addressed, we will call you again. If there is no need, we will not call you. We are not witch hunting anybody.”

Effiong noted: “The IGP is an appointee of the President. Whatever the IGP does speaks volumes of the person of the President. Let us adjourn to look at the documents.”

Hukunyi remarked: “I think some key points have been indicted which I completely align with. One of them is the possibility of adjourning this meeting. He has read his own side, rightly or wrongly. The lawyer to the IGP may have to review some of the things he said. He said virement is a criminal offence. He is wrong.

“The executive is aware of this fact. It has been raised that part of the responsibility of this committee goes beyond the issues that are now in court. There are other issues relevant or not to the case in court. With due respect, as high as your office is, the nature of the issues raised will not good for the IGP or the Senate. These issues need to be cleared. This is the reason why this committee was put in place. At the end of the day, the committee should be able to gather.”

“I think that all of us should understand that the attitude here is not us versus them. We are not here to witch hunt the executive. There are issues that have been raised. We need to address these allegations. At the end of the day, the police may even benefit more from this. We will study your documents and address the issues,” Nyako said.

Meanwhile, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Ita Enang, told the committee that the presidency will explore a multi-door option in resolving the issue.

“We are glad for the warm reception. We are not here out of honour. We are here out of constitutional provisions. We respect the job and powers of the legislature. We thank you for inviting us. We also appreciate what you have said that you want to have an adjournment. I am hoping that this adjournment will pursue other multi-door options to resolve this issues,” he said.

In the end, Alimikhena adjourned the sitting indefinitely. Before he adjourned, he made a point that the Senate has the powers to entertain virement. He maintained that the issue has nothing to do with the court.

“Coming here is your duty. When you are summoned by the parliament, you must come. It is a not a favour. I want to tell you that the issue of virement is the function of the parliament. It is not something that should be handled by the court. I want to tell you this committee came up before you went to court. The court is interfering with our committee. If we need you again, you will respond,” he concluded.
By Ehisuan Odia…..

 

 

RipplesNigeria… without borders, without fears

Click here to join the Ripples Nigeria WhatsApp group for latest updates.

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now

Click to comment

0 Comments

  1. yanju omotodun

    November 9, 2017 at 3:13 am

    This IG of police get sense, so why did he surface there with a lawyer having the intention of not responding to questions. Simply means, his hands are full of dirts.

    • seyi jelili

      November 9, 2017 at 4:10 am

      You are right, misau could right with his allegations against the IG

  2. JOHNSON PETER

    November 9, 2017 at 3:46 am

    I don’t just understand many things again in this country. Senate wants to probe, IG of police said case is in court already, ordinarily how does it stop his answers to questions they want to ask him. Well the Senate are bunch of corrupt people as well even the judiciary.

    • seyi jelili

      November 9, 2017 at 4:10 am

      Federal government is behind this, they are pitching their tents with the IG of police

  3. Anita Kingsley

    November 9, 2017 at 8:58 am

    IGP did the right thing by not responding to the senate comittee, if he had responded, they would have ridiculed him without minding his position in the Police Force.

  4. Animashaun Ayodeji

    November 9, 2017 at 9:05 am

    This is where clear separation of powers ought to come into play. The senate has the right to set up a committee to probe IGP, and the court also has the exclusive right to stop the senate from probing IGP provided the IGP approached the court of law before the committee became functional. Since the senate committee had began operation before Idris went to the court, hence, there’s nothing the court can do until the senate completes its investigation.

    • Abeni Adebisi

      November 9, 2017 at 9:10 am

      Although I cannot ascertain what you have done, but from my instincts, I think you’re very correct. The court should not interfere with what the senate is doing until its done

  5. Abeni Adebisi

    November 9, 2017 at 9:31 am

    A thief cannot probe his fellow thief, all these people are thieves, there’s nothing they can do to IGP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eleven − three =