Connect with us

Politics

Supreme Court scraps law empowering govs to sack LG chairmen

Published

on

Supreme Court scraps law empowering gov's to sack LG chairmen

The Supreme Court on Friday proscribed a law that empowers governors to sack democratically elected local government (LG) chairmen in their states and replacing them with caretaker committees.

While the court described such an act as “executive recklessness”, it also abolished the provisions of the laws enacted by the states’ Houses of Assembly which give state governors powers to dissolve and replace local councils with caretaker committees.

This pronouncement came as a result of a unanimous judgment of Justice Olabode Rhodes-Vivour-led five-man panel of the Supreme Court on Friday, which sat on a case challenging the dissolution of 16 local government councils in Ekiti State by the state’s former governor, Kayode Fayemi.

Fayemi, now the Minister of Solid Mineral Resources, had in October 29, 2010, announced the dissolution of the councils in a radio broadcast, even as the chairmen involved still had up till December 19, 2011, to conclude their three-year tenure.

Read also: Why Supreme Court dismissed case seeking to sack Gov Ayade

The Apex court, in the lead judgment delivered by Justice Chima Nweze, condemned the decision of the then governor.

The court further embraced an earlier order the Court of Appeal gave on the case in its judgment delivered on January 23, 2013. It directed the Ekiti State Government to calculate and pay all the allowances and salaries due to members of the disbanded councils between October 29, 2010 and December 19, 2011, both dates inclusive.

When computed, Governor Ayo Fayose will have to pay 15 months’ salary to the 16 sacked local government chairmen.

In many states across Nigeria, the power and authority vested in the local governments have been radically altered and eroded. The governors of the States hardly allow the LGs to function as the third tier of government and would not allow elections to be conducted into them.

The stranglehold has meant that LGs remained appendages of the the state executives, relying on the whims and caprices of Joint Allocation Committees (JACs) for funding and survival.

In Imo State, for instance, governor Rochas Okorocha had, while refusing to organize local government elections, deployed members of the state legislature to local government areas as Caretaker Committee Chairmen. Also, in Osun State, the executive governor, Rauf Aregbesola, has maintained a tight hold on the LGs, insising that the tier of government was an aberration.

Analysts are eager to see how the Supreme Court decision impacts on State/LG relationships, and the numerous outstanding LG elections in the country.

For the Buhari-led All Progressives Congress (APC), the Supreme Court judgment serves as a litmus test for its avowed commitment to upholding the rule of law.

RipplesNigeria ….without borders, without fears

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now

Click to comment

0 Comments

  1. Roland Uchendu Pele

    December 10, 2016 at 8:16 am

    Governors cannot have so much power. I have been to certain communities with caretaker committees, and nothing really works. why governors do that, I’m not sure.

  2. yanju omotodun

    December 10, 2016 at 8:42 am

    I hope this verdict is respected . governors should know that as they can’t sack house of Assembly members so they can’t sack local government chairman.

    • Nonso Ezeugo

      December 10, 2016 at 7:02 pm

      For were them no reach one most go down

  3. Johnson Amadi

    December 10, 2016 at 8:43 am

    These governors are being insensitive to the fact that there can’t be a state without local governments and the LGs affairs need to be coordinated by a chairman whose authorities must not be jeopardized by the state government

  4. Margret Dickson

    December 10, 2016 at 8:57 am

    These governors mentioned are very useless, they should go to states like Lagos, Ibadan where the state governors understand how local government chairmen are important and treat them with respect

  5. Animashaun Ayodeji

    December 10, 2016 at 9:04 am

    It is important we elect knowledgeable people into various posts, only an illiterate chairman can be bullied by a governor. They were both elected by the masses, they both have constitutional duties and guided by constitution… if a governor bullies or removes a chairman from office illegally, I think the chairman should blamed

  6. JOHNSON PETER

    December 10, 2016 at 9:25 am

    It is high time we see local government as a veritable tool to develop the country. When the 774 local governments in Nigeria are developed, then the country is developed. And that means , we need quality local government leaders than governors . so supreme court verdict should stand firm.

    • Joy Madu

      December 10, 2016 at 9:47 am

      Mtcchew. That judgement is for supreme court and it’s meant for them and not for Nigerin governors. Mind you , if a governor likes, he won’t conduct local government election till his tenure is over.

      • Balarabe musa

        December 10, 2016 at 9:51 am

        That’s true . but with this verdict of the supreme court, the state INEC will conduct election of governors and local government chairmen at the same time and I think we have to extend the tenure of a local government chairman to four years too instead of 3 years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

seven − 4 =