Connect with us

International

US Judge rejects Trump’s bid to end $10k-a-day contempt fine

Published

on

A US judge overseeing the $10,000 daily fine imposed on former President Donald Trump for contempt of court, has declined to vacate the order after rejecting a sworn affidavit by Trump on Friday that he was not in possession of documents earlier subpoenaed by the New York Attorney General’s Office.

The subpoena was issued as part of the attorney general’s civil investigation into the way Trump valued his real estate empire.

In the affidavit, Trump had stated thus:

“To the best of my knowledge, (i) I do not have any of the documents requested in the subpoena dated December 1, 2021 in my personal possession; and (ii) if there are any documents responsive to the subpoena I believe they would be in the possession or custody of the Trump Organization.

“At all relevant times, I have authorized, and continue to authorize, the release of a responsive document to the Office of the Attorney General.:

Read also : Putin would never have considered Ukraine invasion during my time as US President – Trump

But Judge Arthur Engoron was unsatisfied with Trump’s defense and denied his motion to purge the contempt finding and the fine that accompanies it.

The judge’s ruling said that “the affirmations submitted by counsel for Mr. Trump are insufficient in that they fail to specify who searched for each respective request, at what time, where, and using what search protocols; it is not sufficient simply to attach a list of people who participated in the searches.”

“Furthermore,” Engoron added, “Mr. Trump’s personal affidavit fails to state where he kept his files, how his files were stored in the regular course of business, who had access to such files … and, importantly, where he believes such files are currently located.”

Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba while responding to the ruling, said the team would immediately lodge an appeal.

“This Court has improperly held my client in contempt for a violation that he did not commit solely because the OAG declared it ‘insufficient’ without any basis

“We will zealously prosecute our appeal of the Court’s improper application of both law and fact.”

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now

Investigations