Nigeria to lose 20 more communities to Cameroon

Nigeria may lose more of its communities situated in Cross Rivers State to neighbouring Cameroon as the United Nations Nigeria/Cameroon Mixed Commission sets to visit.
The Commission had during its last visit to Bashua and Danare in the Boki Local Government Area of the state in January 2014, readjusted new boundaries covering 25 kilometres – following the inability to trace two key boundary posts (pillars 113A and 114A) that were erected in 1913.
The action sparked off a protest from the leaders of the communities, who alleged that no fewer than 20 Nigerian communities could be ceded to Cameroon if the boundary posts of the 25-kilometre land mass were not found.
Speaker of the Cross River State House of Assembly, Mr. John Gaul-Lebo, who made this known on Monday, stated that the state would resist any boundary adjustment in favour of Cameroon.
He said as the mixed commission prepares to visit the disputed area again, steps would be taken to resist any adjustment that would alter the boundary of the state in favour of Cameroon.
According to him, “The Cross River State Government has made her position clear on the matter. The last time, we heard about their intention to demarcate again the boundary area and the government resisted, the people also resisted. If they come again, we will also resist them within the ambit of the law.
“The people of Boki and, particularly, the disputed boundary areas have every right to be scared and worried. As Speaker of the Cross River State House of Assembly and as a House, we are worried too. But we are vigilant and I want to assure them that we won’t sit down and fold our arms and allow anybody in the name of United Nations or any commission to extend the boundary.”
Gaul-Lebo said it was annoying that another boundary dispute was brewing in Cross River when the state was never mentioned in the International Court of Justice ruling that ceded Bakassi to Cameroon.
He blamed Nigerian government officials for allowing such an adjustment from the international community.

Read also: Buhari adopts UNEF report to clean-up Ogoniland

He said, “The Boki boundary, which includes Danare, is not a maritime boundary but a land boundary and the land boundary was not part of the International Court of Justice ruling in respect of Bakassi. The land boundary issue only came up in respect to the Lake Chad Basin.
“So, our position has been that the maritime boundaries have been concluded with the ceding of Bakassi and other adjourning territories of Abana to Cameroon. Boki land boundary or any other boundary in Cross River State was not specifically mentioned or even articulated by Cameroon as part of claims at the ICJ.
“It is the lack of understanding by Nigeria officials to allow the joint mixed commission to veer off into the land boundary of Boki and other rain forests including the Obudu Ranch Resort.
“I think the Federal Government needs to sit up and have a clear understanding and appreciation of the issues and ensure that they do not overreach the judgment of the ICJ with respect of the land boundary between Nigeria and Cameroon.”

RipplesNigeria… without borders, without fears

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now