Senate, presidency set for another clash over screening of CBN Board members, RECs
Connect with us

Politics

Senate, presidency set for another clash over screening of CBN Board members, RECs

Published

on

BOOMERANG: How Buhari’s coup against Saraki caused APC to lose 48 lawmakers in 2 hours

The Nigerian Senate appears to have run into a constitutional crisis over the recent requests by the Presidency for the confirmation of Board members of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs) for the state’s, sources in the legislature have said.

Lawmakers, who gave insights into the dilemma of the Red Chamber on the
screening requests, told Ripples Nigeria that the Senate took comments from the Presidency about its interpretation
of Section 171 of the 1999 Constitution very seriously.

Recent media reports quoted the Presidency as citing the submission of some lawyers that Section 171 empowers the President to name Heads of extra Ministerial bodies without recourse to the Senate.

The Presidency and the lawyers have used that position to justify the
likely appointment of an Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ibrahim Magu without screening by
the Senate.

But sources in the Senate said the position of the lawyers and the Presidency has thrown up a constitutional crisis which further suggests that previous governments including that of President Olusegun Obasanjo, the late Umaru Yar’Adua, the government of Dr.
Goodluck Jonathan as well as the incumbent, President Muhammadu
Buhari might have acted against the law if the position of the Presidency is right.

“The Senate may have no other option than to hold back on the planned
screening and confirmation of the Board members of the CBN, the Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs) and other nominees sent to the Senate for confirmation,” a Senator said.

The lawmaker said that the Senate had also taken adequate notice of the motion by the House of Representatives, which advised the Presidency to head to the Supreme Court if it was not clear on the
matter.

“As things are, a good number of Senators are pushing that the Senate
takes the media reports of the Presidency’s position on Section 171 as
government’s position since the reports have not been refuted.

“Recall that the famous motion called Doctrine of Necessity was passed
based on a broadcast from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) which was taken as communication from the then President.

“If that position is taken by the leadership, none of the requests for
screening and confirmation would be handled until the matter is sorted
out at the Supreme Court,” a lawmaker in the know said on Monday.

Read also: APC made PDP’s Ekweremadu Dep Senate President, not me, Saraki says

The contentious Section 171 of the 1999 Constitution reads: “171. (1) Power to appoint persons to hold or act in the offices to which this section applies and to remove persons so appointed from any
such office shall vest in the President.

“(2) The offices to which this section applies are, namely –

“(a) Secretary to the Government of the Federation;

“(b) Head of the Civil Service of the Federation;

“(c) Ambassador, High Commissioner or other Principal Representative of Nigeria abroad;

“(d) Permanent Secretary in any Ministry or Head of any Extra-Ministerial Department of the Government of the Federation howsoever designated; and

“(e) any office on the personal staff of the President.

“(3) An appointment to the office of the Head of the Civil Service of the “Federation shall not be made except from among Permanent Secretaries or equivalent rank in the civil service of the Federation or of a State.

“(4) An appointment to the office of Ambassador, High Commissioner or
other Principal Representative of Nigeria abroad shall not have effect unless the appointment is confirmed by the Senate.

“(5) In exercising his powers of appointment under this section, the
President shall have regard to the federal character of Nigeria and the need to promote national unity.

“(6) Any appointment made pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (e) of subsection (2) of this section shall be at the pleasure of the President and shall cease when the President ceases to hold office;

“Provided that where a person has been appointed from a public service of the Federation or a State, he shall be entitled to return to the public service of the Federation or of the State when the President ceases to hold office.”
By Odia Ehisuan…

 

RipplesNigeria ….without borders, without fears

Click here to download the Ripples Nigeria App for latest updates

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now

Click to comment

0 Comments

  1. yanju omotodun

    May 2, 2017 at 8:32 am

    The surpreme should not waste time to interpret the law to as to avoid more constitutional fiat between them.

    • seyi jelili

      May 2, 2017 at 8:42 am

      The Senate has lost their hegemony in this dispensation, they have failed us in everything. Do they have to act childish in all things?

      • JOHNSON PETER

        May 2, 2017 at 9:07 am

        Then the executives should do the needful too. Each arm must respect each other constitutional roles

      • Joy Madu

        May 2, 2017 at 10:48 pm

        That is one thing about the Senate’s they don’t like peace but war

  2. Adeyinka Mayowa

    Anita Kingsley

    May 2, 2017 at 10:04 am

    The lawmakers and executives should go one on one, this one they are having clash every now and then. If it’s boxing ring they want to go fight it out, they should head there and bury their rifts.

  3. Mr Septin911 – Lagos State, Nigeria – I'm not as complicated as you thing, equally not as easy as you've imagined. Huh? Yeah, Don't get it twisted.

    Animashaun Ayodeji

    May 2, 2017 at 10:25 am

    The constitution’s interpretation is one major issue that should have majority’s acceptance. Previous administrations that acted did against the current interpretation, not against the law. The laws have been written and requires the senses of those in power to interpret the laws.

    • Agbor Chris

      May 2, 2017 at 10:39 am

      You’re correct bro. The senate and executive are not united that’s why we’re having conflicts between the two arms. To solve this issue out of court, they will have to join hands together and agree to a particular interpretation, provided they won’t disagree on who’s interpretation to go with

  4. brown charles

    May 3, 2017 at 6:04 am

    The senators have no business remaining at the RED chamber, if they go ahead to suspend legislation!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 − one =

Exit mobile version