Connect with us

Politics

Conceding defeat without a fight was to set a standard for Nigeria’s democracy – Jonathan

Published

on

Conceding defeat without a fight was to set a standard for Nigeria’s democracy – Jonathan

Former President Goodluck Jonathan has no regret conceding defeat as incumbent president in 2015. He said that with the decision he was able to set a standard for the country’s democracy to continue going forward.

Jonathan said that he would not have imagined a situation where, because of contestations for power, Nigeria, the biggest black nation on earth, would slide into anarchy, and put the lives of Nigerians, the country’s economy and investments to the risk of unnecessary destruction.

Jonathan stated this at the sixth edition of African Ambassadors Interactive Forum and Dinner, organised by the African Third Sector Resource in Abuja on Thursday, where he was honoured with “African Leadership & Achievement Award.”

The former president was represented by the former Minister of National Planning, Alhaji Abubakar Suleiman at the event which had its theme as “Deepening Democracy and ensuring human security.”

“I always say that I reformed the democratic process as President in order to consolidate democracy in Nigeria and the sub-region. I conceded defeat without a fight because I wanted to set a standard for our democracy, going forward.

“My aim then was to change the narrative and prove that election-related litigations should no longer define Nigeria’s democracy. People must not always go to court and obtain judgments before elections in Nigeria are declared conclusive.

“We don’t get to hear about such court cases in mature democracies. I wanted us to get to that point in our democratic experience. I thought that it won’t be out of place if we get to that stage where those who lost elections will be able to congratulate those who won,” he said.

Part of the reason, he said, was also to prove some agencies in the United States which had already predicted Nigeria’s disintegration due to the mounting tensions at the time wrong.

“Above all, what that decision did for me and the nation was to avert a looming crisis. Given the tension in the land as of that time, I was deeply contemplative of what would have happened if we had let our nation, the biggest black nation on earth, slide into anarchy, because of contestations for power. What then would have happened to our citizens, Nigeria’s economy and the investments driving its growth?

READ ALSO: Accused of conspiracy against Jonathan, Metuh orders lawyers to review subpoena

“I was convinced that the implications for peace and the economy of the sub-region and the rest of the continent, couldn’t have spelled anything else but doom.

“Recall that after the 2011 presidential election which most observers adjudged transparent, with my victory generally seen to have been well-deserved, crises and conflicts still surfaced that claimed the lives of many of our compatriots, and properties worth billions of naira destroyed,” he said.

 

RipplesNigeria… without borders, without fears

Click here to join the Ripples Nigeria WhatsApp group for latest updates.

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now