Connect with us

Graffiti

Why I’m Afraid of the Break-up of Nigeria

Published

on

Why I'm Afraid of the Break-up of Nigeria

By Gimba Kakanda… Last night, a friend asked me to explain my aversion to the idea of secession, thinking it was the fear, as amplified in certain propagandas, of the North’s foreseen inability to sustain itself economically.

Since it was a private conversation, I elected to present my actual reason bit by bit, some of them I can’t express in public, and offering him a mirror which, when we were done, reflected a possibility that scared him too.

I’m afraid of secession for the very reason a part of Nigeria seeks to leave. Cultural hegemony. A domination of diverse society by the elite using ethnicity, religion and all the binary identities and sentiments available to hold on to power, and to forestall criticism of them and revolt of the manipulated masses.

How has cultural hegemony held Nigeria together? The reason Nigeria hasn’t degenerated into full-blown autocratic regime is because of conflicting cultural hegemonies that exist like a tripartite coalition government – an ethnic arrangement that restricts the tyranny of the three parts, the “Hausa-Fulani,” the Igbo and Yoruba.

There’s a mechanism of checks and balances of cultural hegemony as Nigeria stands today, along the ethnic lines of these three dominating ethnic groups, as there is along religious lines between Islam and Christianity of the political North and the South, respectively.

What happens after the breakup? I’ll address the question of struggle for power in the North instead. The region’s cultural hegemony, which the federating South has tackled, albeit not successfully, levers around Islam and the so-called “Hausa-Fulani” supergroup.

A secession means unrestricted evolution of this cultural hegemony through manipulation of the gullible masses in the name of Islam and by stoking ethnic sentiments as conduits to political power and relevance.

Read also: Nigeria and “The Butterfly Effect”

This arrangement favours characters like Senator Ahmed Yerima of Zamfara state, who as Governor introduced a gimmick he called Sharia simply to protect his political capitals. His friends, realizing the success of such arrangement and financial aid pouring in from oil-rich Arab nations, joined him in that smokescreen to enrich themselves corruptly. Some of them are parties to pending cases of corruption at the Court or still under the radar of our anti-corruption agencies.

The good news, however, was that we had a member of another cultural hegemony, a Christian from the political south, as head of the national government, and even opposing the northern political chessboard that seemed to alienate him.

The Yerimas of Northern Nigeria may be local champions now, but the moment their allies from other cultural hegemonies withdraw, a new order of tyrannical rule, in connivance with religious clerics and socio-cultural “ambassadors,” will manifest.

The implication is an outright manipulation of Islamic jurisprudence, an Islamo-fascism, to institutionalize oppression and enable corruption. And I can only imagine the extent of its devastations with personality cults forming around some ascetic criminals.

I think this fear explains the convergence of another self-elected representatives of northern “minorities” who, calling themselves “Middle Belt Leaders’ Forum,” met yesterday in Abuja to debate their place and prospects in Nigeria, now and later. It’s not a coincidence that the Jerry Gana-led gathering was dominated by Christians (and “other minorities”) out of political offices, and ambitious.

As a Muslim, there’s nothing that scares me like an attempt to police my private moralities in a secular political arrangement that does not evaluate and redeem the pseudo-religious Police. It’s fascism manifesting, and I’ll rather die fighting this than flee.

So, my friends from the South, it’s not untrue that I do not want you to leave. But it’s not for your resources. Assessing the welfare of my people, it’s sad to say they are of no essence to us. We, and I include you too, have neither access to good hospitals nor schools, neither good network of roads nor security. I only want you to stay to sustain the checks and balances of this hegemonic order.

 

RipplesNigeria ….without borders, without fears

Click here to download the Ripples Nigeria App for latest updates

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now

Click to comment

0 Comments

  1. ClassLLess

    June 25, 2017 at 2:49 pm

    One problem with this article is that the author lacks dept and uses words in such a manner that its original connotation is purgored and we all lose the reality we were supposed to capture. For example the singular word, hegemony. The author applied the qualification “cultural hegemony” but went on to imply or even mention “cultural hegemonies”, in a way that bastardized the entired concept of hegemony as the CONTROL OF OTHER GROUPS BY ONE GROUP – the hegemon.

    Hegemony is not a plural concept allowing for many-to-many controls in the way the author has bastardized it. He was projecting the fallasy that three groups have hegemonic control of nigeria, which is not true. Consequently, he could not pull off even the language to describe multiparty hegemony, since no such reality exists in fact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

five × 1 =