Connect with us

Politics

A mistake is no basis for criminal charge, Rickey Tarfa tells EFCC

Published

on

A mistake is no basis for criminal charge, Rickey Tarfa tells EFCC

Counsel to Rickey Tarfa, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, on Friday told the Lagos State High Court in Lagos that his client made a mistake which the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has latched on to file criminal charges against him.

The counsel, Jelili Owonikoko, also a SAN, stated that “Tarfa made a mistake, which the EFCC ought to have drawn his attention to rather than springing a surprise on him by making the mistake a basis for a criminal charge”.

This is in the ongoing trial of Tarfa on an amended 26-count charge bordering on alleged willful obstruction of authorised officials of the EFCC, refusal to declare assets, making false information and offering gratification to a public official.

Presiding judge, Justice Adedayo Akintoye, dismissed a no-case submission filed by Tarfa, in response to the criminal charge filed against him by the EFCC.

In the application, Tarfa, through his counsel, prayed the court to “slam the hammer” on the EFCC for what he described as “malicious prosecution.”

Tarfa also prayed the court to award the sum of N520 million damages to him as compensation.

On the allegation that the defendant lied about his age during interrogation, the defence counsel, Owonikoko, said there was a difference between falsehood and mistake.

“Tarfa made a mistake, which the EFCC ought to have drawn his attention to rather than springing a surprise on him by making the mistake a basis for a criminal charge,” Owonikoko said.

Tarfa’s lawyer further submitted that his client’s reputation and occupation had suffered a great deal.

However, the prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, opposed Tarfa’s no-case submission, and urged the court to dismiss the application.

Oyedepo also urged the court to call on the defendant to explain the allegations against him.

Read also: Justices Ademola, Tokode dismissed by Buhari

Delivering his ruling today, Justice Akintoye held that the arguments on the no-case submission advanced by counsel to the defendant could not hold water at this stage of the trial because the prosecution had established a prima-facie case against the defendant.

“The prosecution has established extended elements of facts in the charge. The evidence of the prosecution has not been discredited during cross- examination by the defence.

“I find no merit in this prayer. The no-case submission is hereby dismissed,” the judge said.

Consequently, the judge ordered the defendant to open his defence.

Justice Akintoye adjourned to March 13, 21 and 22, 2018 for the defendant to open his defence.

The EFCC had, on October 23, 2017, closed its case against Tarfa, after presenting a number of witnesses who testified against the defendant.

A prosecution witnesses, Usman Zakari, an investigator with the EFCC, had told the court how the defendant lied about his age and how he refused to fill the assets declaration form administered on him in line with the EFCC Act Section 7 (a) and (b).

 

RipplesNigeria… without borders, without fears

Click here to join the Ripples Nigeria WhatsApp group for latest update

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now