SOCIAL MEDIA, HATE SPEECH BILLS: Senate won’t pass any anti-people laws —Ahmad Lawan

Senate President Ahmad Lawan has said that the National Assembly would not pass any anti-people laws.

He stated this in response to a protest letter by Human Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) against the hate speech and anti-social media bills that have passed various levels of reading at the Senate.

HURIWA had written the letter to the Senate President amid the opposition that has continued to mount against the two controversial bills.

Ahmad’s reply was contained in a letter to HURIWA dated November 20, 2019, and endorsed by his Chief of Staff; Alhaji Babagana M. Aji.

The letter, which was received on December 4, 2019, and entitled “RE: Why National Assembly’s bills against free speech are unconstitutional: BY HURIWA” read:

“I write to present the compliments of the President of the Senate, His Excellency, Sen. Ahmad Ibrahim Lawan, Ph.D., CON and to acknowledge receipt of your letter on the above subject wherein you asked the National Assembly to suspend ad infinitum the current attempts at introducing obnoxious legislation to curb access to social media.”

“His Excellency is appreciative of your concern towards upholding our constitution and your members’ continuous use of their talents as writers to promote, protect and project the human rights of all Nigerians. His Excellency assures you that the Senate will not pass any anti-people laws.

“While thanking you, please accept the assurances of the President of the Senate.”

HURIWA’s letter which was sent to Lawan on November 13, 2019, through the offices of the Senate President read in part:

“Freedom of expression is one of the fundamental rights provided in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended). By virtue of the same and other international instruments, it is the freedom to hold opinions, receive ideas and information and impart ideas and information without interference. Social media is used in reference to the means of expression other than the mainstream media.

READ ALSO: EFCC arraigns ‘Mama Boko Haram’ Aisha Wakil, one other for alleged N66m fraud

“Freedom of Expression in Nigeria is grounded constitutionally in Section 39 of the CFRN entrenches the right to freedom of expression in the following words:

(1) Every person shall be entitled to freedom of expression, including the freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference.

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection 1 of this section, every person shall be entitled to own, establish and operate any medium for the dissemination of information ideas and opinions:

Provided that no person, other than the Government of the Federation or of a State or any other person or body authorized by the President on the fulfillment of conditions laid down by an Act of the National Assembly, shall own, establish or operate a television or wireless broadcasting a station for any purpose whatsoever.”

The Rights group said similar provisions are found in Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.”

Among other things, the group urged the National Assembly to stop forthwith any attempt to legislate laws that offend the Rights to Freedom of Speech.

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now