Connect with us

Politics

DSS bar journalists from covering Kanu’s trial, accredits only 10 media houses

Published

on

DSS stops June 12 rally in Ibadan, arrests three

The Directorate of State Services (DSS) has barred journalists from major newspaper houses in the country from covering the renewed trial of the leader of the Indegenous People of Biafra (IPOB) Nnamdi Kanu.

The secret police accredited only 10 journalists to cover the trial, while refusing to allow any other journalists near the court proceedings.

A memo titled ‘Media Accreditation For Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial’ seen by Ripples Nigeria on Monday, showed that major media houses like the Punch, Guardian, Vanguard, Daily Sun, Daily Trust and Tribune among others, were barred from covering the event.

However, among media houses approved by the DSS were the ThisDay, The Nation, Daily Independent, The Herald, and broadcasting stations like National Television Authority (NTA), Television Continental (TVC), African Independent Television (AIT), and Channels Television.

Though the DSS did not give reasons for barring the media houses from covering Kanu’s trial, some media experts and lawyers believe it could be part of the gagging of the press by the President Muhammadu Buhari-led administration which seems bent on censoring the media, especially those they believe have been harsh in criticising the regime.

Comdemning the DSS decision, fiery lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mike Ozekhome, said the position of the law was that every trial should be carried out in public and everyone entitled to watch the proceedings.

Read also: Court orders DSS to produce Igboho’s 12 detained aides

The legal practitioner in a post of his Facebook wall, said “Our legal system does not admit secret trials. We are not a country of witches and wizards operating in a coven.

“For a trial to be free and fair, Section 36 of the Constitution says it must be carried out openly and publicly.

“Banning some media houses from covering Nnamdi Kanu’s trial is not only a sin against Section 36 of the Constitution, it also violently offends the provision of Section 22 of the same Constitution which gives the media the right and responsibility to ensure that the provisions of Chapter Two of the constitution dealing with the fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy are upheld and that the government is held accountable to the people of Nigeria.”

Another Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Remi Olatubora, said preventing media organisations from performing their constitutional duty runs contrary to the right to freedom of expression as guaranteed under Chapter Four of the Nigerian Constitution.

Also expressing his dismay at the DSS action, a media expert, Tobiloba Fatai, told Ripples Nigeria that the action was a prelude to widespread gagging of the media.

“I am not the least surprised by excluding media houses that have have been consistent in criticising Buhari and his administration.

“Don’t forget that the likes of Punch have been hitting this government real hard. Remember their vow to be addressing Buhari as a retired Major General? They have stuck to that vow and the Presidency is definitely not happy with that and this is surely their pay back time. This is the prelude to a proper media gag by the Buhari-led administration.”

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now

Investigations