EFCC’s cybercrime suit against Naira Marley stalled

The trial of Nigerian singer Azeez Fashola, popularly known as Naira Marley, on Wednesdays could not proceed before a Federal High Court in Lagos due to a pending application for fiat before the Chief Judge of the court.

The trial judge, Justice Isaac Dipeolu, was informed by the prosecutor, Bilikisu Buhari, that an application for fiat to help the former judge to continue with the trial of the defendant is already awaiting approval by the Chief Judge of the court.

Buhari disclosed that the application is dated December 8, 2023.

According to reports the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting Naira Marley on charges bordering on cybercrime.

The anti-graft agency preferred the charges on May 14, 2019.

Marley, however, was arraigned on May 20, 2019, before Justice Nicholas Oweiboo, but he had pleaded not guilty.

Justice Oweibo had granted him bail in the sum of two million naira, with two sureties in like sum.

The trial has since begun in the case, and witnesses were still being led in evidence, but Justice Oweibo, who was later transferred out of the Lagos division of the court.

READ ALSO: MOHBAD: Naira Marley, Sam Larry out of custody as Court grants them N20m bail

The case was therefore transferred to a new judge, Dipeolu.

When the case was called for the first time before Justice Dipeolu, Buhari appeared for the prosecution, while V.C. Maduagwu appeared for the defendant.

Defence counsel also confirmed the position as stated by the prosecutor to the court.

Based on information about the pending application for fiat brought to the attention of the new judge by counsel, the court consequently, adjourned the case until May 30 for a report.

According to the EFCC, the defendant committed the offences on different dates between Nov. 26, 2018 and Dec. 11, 2018, as well as May 10, 2019.

The anti-graft agency alleged that Marley and his accomplices conspired to use different Access Bank ATM cards to defraud their victims.

It alleged that the defendant used a bank credit card issued to another person in a bid to obtain fraudulent financial gains.

The EFCC also alleged that the defendant possessed counterfeit credit cards belonging to different people, with the intent to defraud, which amounted to theft.

The alleged offences contravene the provisions of Sections 1–23(1)(b), 27(1), and 33(9) of the Cyber Crime (Prohibition) Prevention Act, 2015.

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now