Connect with us

Politics

NJC accuses Buhari of hypocrisy, says he’s keeping corrupt judges

Published

on

NJC accuses Buhari of hypocrisy, says he's keeping corrupt judges

As expected, the showdown between the National Judicial Council (NJC) and the Presidency may have kicked off as the judicial body has branded President Muhammadu Buhari a hypocrite.

It said it was disappointed that the Presidency turned around to accuse NJC of shielding corrupt Judges, when those that were found culpable and recommended for dismissal since President Buhari’s administration came on board, have not been removed till date.

This was contained in a statement NJC released through its director of information, Mr. Soji Oye on Saturday.

NJC was reacting to accusations by the Presidency that it was supporting corruption by recalling five suspended judges the Federal Government accused of corruption but failed to charge to court eight months after.

The Presidency had also criticised the NJC for also recalling Justice Adeniyi Ademola, one of the judges accused of corruption but who was discharged and acquitted by a Federal High Court; a judgment the government has appealed.

But NJC responding to the issues, said it was “constrained” to disclose that Buhari is still keeping some Judges it penned for dismissal over their involvement in acts of corruption.

It said: “But for suspension of the affected Judicial Officers from Office by National Judicial Council, they would have to date been still performing their Judicial duties.

“And these are Officers that have been found culpable of gross misconduct by NJC after due process and diligent fact finding investigation by Council based on the Rule of Law enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, NJC Discipline Regulations and Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“The number of Judicial Officers that have been removed from office for misconduct particularly for corrupt practices since President Buhari administration came on board, that has been made public by National Judicial Council in October and November, 2016, speaks for itself in that vein.

Read also: ANTI-GRAFT WAR: Despite alleged sabotage, Senate says it’s led from the frontline

“Some of the Judicial Officers were removed from office by dismissal or compulsory retirement by the President or Governors on the recommendation of the National Judicial Council.

“While a number of the Judicial Officers were reprimanded by Council in the exercise of its constitutional powers to exercise disciplinary control over Judges of Superior Courts of record in the Federation.

“Council is constrained to say that some of the Judicial Officers that have been recommended for dismissal or compulsory retirement from Office by the Presidency or Governors, have not to date been removed from Office”.

The NJC explained that its decision to recall the suspended judges was based on the Principles of Rule of Law and fairness.

It however berated the Chairman, Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) Professor Itse Sagay, SAN, over his comments that the judiciary was not in support of the anti-graft war of the present administration.

“Council is particularly concerned about the Press statement issued by Okoi Obono-Obla, Esq, Special Assistant to the President on Prosecution on 8th June, 2017; that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation filed a Notice of Appeal against the Ruling of Hon. Justice Jude Okeke of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, for discharging and acquitting Hon. Justice A. F. A. Ademola and 2 ORS on 7th April, 2017.

“Contrary to the above statement, the Registry of the High Court of the FCT, Abuja, informed the Department of Information of the National Judicial Council that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation filed two Notices of Appeal in the Court; the first one on 7th April, 2017, against Hon Justice A. F. A. Ademola, his wife, Olabowale Ademola and Joe Agi, SAN. The second one was filed on 6th of June, 2017, two days after the Press Release was issued by the National Judicial Council, with additional grounds of appeal against only Hon. Justice A.F.A. Ademola.

“It is on record that when the Parties were invited by High Court of the FCT for settlement of records to be transmitted to the Court of Appeal on 18th April, 2017, the Appellant failed to turn up. The Registrar of the Court further adjourned the settlement of records to 21st April, 2017, and invited all the Parties, but the Appellant again did not come to Court.

“The total number of 45 days allowed for compilation of record in all circumstances expired on 7th May, 2017, for the Registrar of the Lower Court and 22nd May, 2017, for the Appellant.

“Council noted that the Office of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice only filed additional grounds of appeal in the Court on Tuesday 6th June, 2017, three days after the Press Release by the Council that the Judicial Officers have been directed to resume their Judicial duties.

“It was on 6th June, 2017, that letters were again issued by the Registrar to the Parties for settlement of records against 14th June, 2017.

“For avoidance of doubt, by the Rules of the Court of Appeal, there cannot be a proper appeal before the Court until Parties have agreed and settled records before the Lower Court and transmit copies of such records to the Court of Appeal before an appeal number is given. It is only after an appeal number is given that an appeal is said to be entered in the Court of Appeal.

“The Council confirmed from Registry of the Court of Appeal that there is no such Appeal till date. The only matter that is pending is a Motion with Number CA/A/371M/CR/2019 filed by Joe Odey Agi, SAN, against the Federal Republic of Nigeria seeking the dismissal of Appellant/Respondent appeal between the Federal Government of Nigeria Vs Joe Odey Agi for failure to transmit the Records from the Lower Court within 45 days.

“Council is aware that at the Code of Conduct Tribunal, the Federal Government filed Suits against Hon. Justices N. S. Ngwuta and Inyang Okoro of the Supreme Court and A. F. A. Ademola of the Federal High Court on 8th February, 2017.

“However, the Federal Ministry of Justice later withdrew the files pertaining the Suits against Hon. Justices Inyang Okoro and A. F. A. Ademola, with the intention of filing additional evidence against them.

“In the case of Hon. Justice Ngwuta, he has since been arraigned before the Code of Conduct Tribunal for non-declaration of his assets.

“In effect, there is currently no Suit filed against Hon. Justices Inyang Okoro and A. F. A. Ademola J. at the Tribunal”, the Council stated.

The NJC said it was aware that some major Stakeholders in the Judiciary and Justice Delivery Sector in conjunction with the Nigerian Bar Association, met with the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Abubakar Malami, SAN, and Anti-Graft and Security Agencies before the Judicial Officers were recalled, to discuss the subject matter and in particular the fate of the Judicial Officers that have not been charged and arraigned.

“When no progress was made, the NJC, which is the only Constitutional Institution empowered to exercise disciplinary control over Judicial Officers for misconduct, decided to recall the Judicial Officers.

“It is to be stressed that our criminal justice is also predicated on accusatorial system and NOT inquisitorial. Thus, every accused person is presumed to be innocent until his guilt is proved beyond reasonable doubt by the prosecution.

“On the foregoing, Council is compelled to inform the public that the decision it took to direct the affected Justices/Judges to recuse themselves from performing their judicial duties, was borne out of respect for the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice; and in order to maintain the integrity and sanctity of the Judiciary and sustain public confidence.

“Council reiterates that it shall continue to support the President Buhari Administration posture in its fight against corruption in all its ramifications in the Federation; and in cleansing the Judiciary of corrupt Judicial Officers, under the purview of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the principles of the Rule of Law enshrined therein.”

 

RipplesNigeria ….without borders, without fears

Click here to download the Ripples Nigeria App for latest updates

Join the conversation

Opinions

Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism

Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.

As a media platform, we hold leadership accountable and will not trade the right to press freedom and free speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and are ready to uphold solutions journalism, kindly donate to the Ripples Nigeria cause.

Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.

Donate Now

Click to comment

0 Comments

  1. seyi jelili

    June 11, 2017 at 12:58 pm

    The truth of the matter is that Nigerian judiciary is full of corrupt judges and likewise Buhari is not transparent in his against these corrupt judges. He should have dismissed the judges the NJC recommended too

    • Animashaun Ayodeji

      June 11, 2017 at 3:15 pm

      NJC recommended judges for dismissal, Buhari refused to take actions, EFCC pronounced some judges corrupt, the court didn’t find them guilty, is this not clear enough that the NJC already took its revenge?

    • Oise Oikelomen

      June 11, 2017 at 5:38 pm

      Don’t you get tired of stating the obvious? I’ve observed that your standby comment on every article about the suspended judges always goes something like “The truth of the matter is that Nigerian judiciary is full of corrupt judges . . . “. Doesn’t it bother you that the Presidency insists on being a judge in its own case?

      • Sadiq Garba

        June 12, 2017 at 1:49 pm

        Is the presidency on trial?

        • Oise Oikelomen

          June 12, 2017 at 6:48 pm

          I meant a case they have brought to court. As in, being the accuser and the judge.

    • yanju omotodun

      June 12, 2017 at 4:19 am

      There is no how president Buhari would have sacked the judges the NJC counseled him to dismiss without proper investigation . In law, someone has to prove beyond reasonable doubts that someone is corrupt before he or she is sanctioned. Probably, Buhari set a panel to checkmate these judges and were found guiltless, we won’t have known such.

  2. Abeni Adebisi

    June 11, 2017 at 3:18 pm

    I don’t see anything reasonable in what NJC is fighting for, the body houses corrupt judges, its dismissal cannot be taken seriously by Mr. President, because none of them can be trusted

  3. Anita Kingsley

    June 11, 2017 at 3:21 pm

    The judiciary ought to have expected this from Buhari since he packed all his people into power with him. Buhari is highly sentimental and always acting like he’s a saint, he’s also a corrupt leader in disguise, any leader who fails to do the right things is corrupt

    • Balarabe musa

      June 12, 2017 at 4:44 am

      You are stupid walahi. Are you doing the right thing as a citizen, then you are corrupt.is it his people that he packed in to governance that is making you angry? Get lost.

  4. Oise Oikelomen

    June 11, 2017 at 5:48 pm

    I fail to understand why Buhari’s Presidency insists on being the only body qualified to pronounce people guilty or innocent of corruption. It’s quite disturbing that the Presidency will, by its actions and pronouncements, insist that someone is guilty/innocent when the Judiciary says otherwise. This government has very low regard for rule of law. Sad, very sad. You think the Judiciary is corrupt?? I think so too, but that’s not enough reason why Buhari will now want to take over their duty. He has not done his own work well, so why does he think he can do other people’s work better than them?? And all the lies and deceit. Coming here to complain that NJC recalled Justice Ademola even after the Presidency has appealed his case, when in reality you completed your appeal process after he has been recalled. I smh!

  5. Muhammad

    June 15, 2017 at 5:55 pm

    It is interestingly exposing , to see lack of restraint on both sides laying bare before the third party public , the inadequacies of the two arms of government in serving the polity , above the board of complaints against the ousted government .
    Shame !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

thirteen + fifteen =