The Buhari Media Organization (BMO) on Monday clarified that the proscribed Islamic Movement of Nigeria led by Sheik Ibrahim El-zakzaky was not the umbrella body of Shi’ites in the country.
This is coming as some Nigerians appeared to have got their facts wrong on the group and the proscription order issued by the Federal High Court in Abuja.
BMO expressed dismay that groups like the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) are jumping on the bandwagon without having a full grasp of the issues at stake.
BMO made the assertion in a statement signed by its chairman, Niyi Akinsiju and secretary, Cassidy Madueke.
It said was instructive that most of the critics of the proscription order were from a section of Nigeria.
“We are alarmed that some people have been pushing false narratives on a blanket ban on activities of Shiites across the country. They have opted to misrepresent the IMN as the umbrella body of Shiites in Nigeria even when it is common knowledge in the North that not all Shiites are members of the group led by Sheikh Ibraheem El-Zakzaky.
“For the benefit of those who are in the dark, there are about nine organisations that subscribe to the Shia Muslim ideology aside from the now proscribed group and according to Rasulul Aazam Foundation (RAAF) one of the other Shiites groups, not all of them abide by the philosophy of the El-Zakzaky group.
“It is a known fact that IMN had always operated what many people in Northern Nigeria described as a sovereign entity where every member owes their allegiance to Sheikh Elzakzaky and are not known to believe in the Nigerian system or respect constituted authority, contrary to the picture being painted of them in recent times.
“And as the Presidential spokesman Mallam Garba Shehu pointed out last weekend- the proscription order does not amount to a ban on Shiites from carrying out their religious obligations. It is targeted specifically at IMN which the Presidency said has been taken over by extremists who have used arson and violence to drive fear into people as recently experienced in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) where, they had, in the last two weeks carried out audacious attacks on the National Assembly complex and a NEMA bay within the Federal secretariat , killed a senior police officer and a youth corps member as well as destroy ambulances and other government properties.
“We also recall that barely one day after Deputy Commissioner of Police Usman Umar was killed during the violent protest, IMN members were seen on the streets of Abuja wearing military fatigues in what is seen as a show of force.
READ ALSO: Troops kill 10 terrorists in Borno
“Any resident of Zaria will tell you that blocking major highways without consideration for other road users had become a way of life for this group that some people have deceptively described as being peaceful.”
BMO added that it was ironic that the umbrella body of Christians which had accused President Muhammadu Buhari of harbouring an Islamisation agenda is backing a group which has not hidden its goals of a total Islamisation of Nigeria which a visit to its website will validate.
It said: “We are still confused about CAN’s stance on the proscribed group. Here is an association that has since the outset of the Buhari administration accused the President of working on an Islamisation plan.
“CAN had also once alleged that the foundation for Islamisation was laid by the makers of the Nigerian Constitution and had always been sceptical of every action of the government including subscribing to the Sukuk bond and President Buhari’s decision to attend a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).
“But today the Christian body is one of the biggest defenders of a group which is driven by the aspiration of having an Ayatollah installed as the leader of the country just like what Iran has in place. Clearly, if there is anyone that has an Islamisation agenda, it is the IMN, yet CAN is ironically defending its right and accusing the Buhari administration of ‘impure intentions’ in proscribing it.
“Many Nigerians are however not surprised that CAN is throwing its weight behind a group that appears to be opposed to President Buhari because it has an agenda of opposition to the administration itself.”
Join the conversation
Support Ripples Nigeria, hold up solutions journalism
Balanced, fearless journalism driven by data comes at huge financial costs.
If you are motivated and passionate about building a global society, founded on justice, equity, fairness, transparency, accountability and superior knowledge, kindly consider donating to Ripples Nigeria’s solutions journalism.
Your support would help to ensure that citizens and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for societal development.
INVESTIGATION: Inside UNILAG’s multi-million naira budgetary abuse and academic discord
The University of Lagos located in Nigeria’s commercial capital, Lagos, has been embroiled in controversies with allegations bothering on misappropriation of...
SPECIAL REPORT: Displaced residents of Zamfara battle hunger, as underfunding derails Nigeria’s nutrition goals
On paper, Muhammad Zayyanu is seven years old. The quiet boy who looks shorter for his age could not recollect...
INVESTIGATION: N7.3bn paid for unnamed projects; how Nigerian govt spent N2.2trn in six months
Analysing nearly 3,000 payments made by various Federal Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) over the previous six months (January...
INVESTIGATION… Delay rocks Nigerian govt’s promise of N30,000 covid-19 relief for artisans, others
Before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in February, 2020, Chukwudi Okoroigwe’s daily earnings as a bus driver was hardly enough to cater to the...
INVESTIGATION… Ten years after, communities count losses as AfDB, Cross River govt abandon road project
Ten years after the Cross River State government and African Development Bank (AFDB) jointly awarded the Yahe-Wanokom-Wanikade-Benue border road for...